Bilbo's Labyrinth?
On the plus side, the guy's apparently visually creative and good with the monsters--which bodes well for the spiders and, of course, for Smaug. (The spiders I might not watch. A good dragon on the big screen, though? That's worth nine dollars.)
But I have to say, I'm a little worried about the whole thing. I hate the idea of the second movie--a link between The Hobbit and The Fellowship of the Ring, which will be only loosely based on Tolkien's writings and (unless the writers are very careful) could create all sorts of continuity problems. I haven't seen any of del Toro's movies, so I'm not really sure what to think. (I may have to watch Pan's Labyrinth now. . .) By all accounts he's a gifted director, but he seems to have a penchant for darkness and disturbingness. Not ideal for The Hobbit, which is much lighter in tone than The Lord of the Rings--a children's adventure story rather than a prose epic.
But at least the Lord of the Rings people won't be writing this one. I love the trilogy, and always will; but it has some serious weaknesses on the writing side--and the characterization of Gimli is particularly bad. With different writers, there's a chance the Dwarves in the Hobbit will get to be more than awkward comic relief.
And since Peter Jackson is involved, we'll probably get to see more of Ian McKellen's Gandalf. Which is definitely a good thing.
Labels: movie news, The Hobbit